<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Eve Ensler&#039;s got nothing on John Paul II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2008/09/26/why-eve-enslers-got-nothing-on-john-paul-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2008/09/26/why-eve-enslers-got-nothing-on-john-paul-ii/</link>
	<description>Real Love. Real Natural.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Croft</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2008/09/26/why-eve-enslers-got-nothing-on-john-paul-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nfpworks.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Right!? Beautifully said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right!? Beautifully said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfpworks</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2008/09/26/why-eve-enslers-got-nothing-on-john-paul-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>nfpworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nfpworks.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Hi Lavanna. Thank you for your encouragement. I&#039;m glad you love John Paul II. He was a holy man of truth and love. Lavanna, what do you love about John Paull?

I agree that we should strive to see the best in every one. I knew Eve Ensler personally, I might be able to speak to her personal virtues, but as it is, much of her public persona is the Vagina Monologues. However, I also believe we should correct those in error. And the principles upon which the Monologues are based--well-intentioned though they may be--are ultimately based upon an incorrect anthropology. The Theology of the Body (which is nothing new, just a new perspective on the same old Christian teaching) is a more unified, liberated view of our selves and our bodies than radical feminism, and ultimately it&#039;s about our purpose, vocation and destiny. Theology of the Body involves our sexuality because we are sexual persons (ie, masculine and feminine), but it&#039;s not just about &quot;doing it.&quot; It&#039;s not just about sex. I encourage you to learn more about theology of the Body at www.theologyofthebody.net. We were made to love as God loves. That&#039;s what TOB is about.

I&#039;m not sure what I politicized, so I can&#039;t really respond to that. I did mention Marxism, but I was speaking to the materialist philosophy Marxism and its feminist branch, Marxist feminism, rather than the political ramifications of the philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lavanna. Thank you for your encouragement. I&#8217;m glad you love John Paul II. He was a holy man of truth and love. Lavanna, what do you love about John Paull?</p>
<p>I agree that we should strive to see the best in every one. I knew Eve Ensler personally, I might be able to speak to her personal virtues, but as it is, much of her public persona is the Vagina Monologues. However, I also believe we should correct those in error. And the principles upon which the Monologues are based&#8211;well-intentioned though they may be&#8211;are ultimately based upon an incorrect anthropology. The Theology of the Body (which is nothing new, just a new perspective on the same old Christian teaching) is a more unified, liberated view of our selves and our bodies than radical feminism, and ultimately it&#8217;s about our purpose, vocation and destiny. Theology of the Body involves our sexuality because we are sexual persons (ie, masculine and feminine), but it&#8217;s not just about &#8220;doing it.&#8221; It&#8217;s not just about sex. I encourage you to learn more about theology of the Body at <a href="http://www.theologyofthebody.net" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theologyofthebody.net','http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theologyofthebody.net')" rel="nofollow">http://www.theologyofthebody.net</a>. We were made to love as God loves. That&#8217;s what TOB is about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what I politicized, so I can&#8217;t really respond to that. I did mention Marxism, but I was speaking to the materialist philosophy Marxism and its feminist branch, Marxist feminism, rather than the political ramifications of the philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lavanna</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2008/09/26/why-eve-enslers-got-nothing-on-john-paul-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>lavanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nfpworks.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Please keep writing.  Even though I am not a Catholic, I love John Paul II.  We should strive to see the best in everyone - why does everything have to be sexualized and/or politicized?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please keep writing.  Even though I am not a Catholic, I love John Paul II.  We should strive to see the best in everyone &#8211; why does everything have to be sexualized and/or politicized?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
