<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think Again Thursday (ThAT): Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/</link>
	<description>Real Love. Real Natural.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:37:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think most people are that lazy or stupid. They manage to achieve many other basic things in life that take the same skills it takes to read a temperature or write down an observation. As to your last (unpublished) comment--this isn&#039;t the place for that conversation. We&#039;re here to talk about women&#039;s fertility, not debate a bad legal decision from 37 years ago. But to that end, may God change your heart and Our Lady of Guadalupe intercede for you now and at the hour of your death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think most people are that lazy or stupid. They manage to achieve many other basic things in life that take the same skills it takes to read a temperature or write down an observation. As to your last (unpublished) comment&#8211;this isn&#8217;t the place for that conversation. We&#8217;re here to talk about women&#8217;s fertility, not debate a bad legal decision from 37 years ago. But to that end, may God change your heart and Our Lady of Guadalupe intercede for you now and at the hour of your death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcia Garcia Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcia Garcia Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Re: Taking time, temperature and cervical mucus measurements invites a significant margin of human error [only if you&#039;re lazy or stupid].

I think the point there is that most people are too lazy, too stupid and not responsible enough for the entire NFP process. That is how my cousin got pregnant before she was ready. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Taking time, temperature and cervical mucus measurements invites a significant margin of human error [only if you're lazy or stupid].</p>
<p>I think the point there is that most people are too lazy, too stupid and not responsible enough for the entire NFP process. That is how my cousin got pregnant before she was ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>Welcome, Mary Helen, and happy reading! How did you find my blog, new friend?

It&#039;s true. I did &quot;promote&quot; her blog by posting links there. No more, though. I have to be honest, though, it probably ticked her traffic into the *high teens*, so I&#039;m not too conflicted about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome, Mary Helen, and happy reading! How did you find my blog, new friend?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true. I did &#8220;promote&#8221; her blog by posting links there. No more, though. I have to be honest, though, it probably ticked her traffic into the *high teens*, so I&#8217;m not too conflicted about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>Rachel has a point, as much as I appreciate you posting her uneducated, un-researched, and pathetic description of NFP, we are probably just giving her more recognition that it&#039;s worth.  We&#039;re better off just shaking our heads and continuing to promote truth in a world that clearly needs it, rather than stroking her ego.  She&#039;ll understand one day...    Keep up the good work though!  I just found your blog and love it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel has a point, as much as I appreciate you posting her uneducated, un-researched, and pathetic description of NFP, we are probably just giving her more recognition that it&#8217;s worth.  We&#8217;re better off just shaking our heads and continuing to promote truth in a world that clearly needs it, rather than stroking her ego.  She&#8217;ll understand one day&#8230;    Keep up the good work though!  I just found your blog and love it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible for you to post the comment without the link. You have editing capabilities, it turns out. Re: traffic: Anything for you, Rach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible for you to post the comment without the link. You have editing capabilities, it turns out. Re: traffic: Anything for you, Rach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Arbeit</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Arbeit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I don&#039;t approve comments that link to other sites because it&#039;s free advertising and I&#039;m not down with that. I do, however, appreciate the traffic you&#039;re bringing to my little blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I don&#8217;t approve comments that link to other sites because it&#8217;s free advertising and I&#8217;m not down with that. I do, however, appreciate the traffic you&#8217;re bringing to my little blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you&#039;re up and at &#039;em today, since I just posted my (probably unpublished) comment on your &quot;Dear NFP&quot; entry. I&#039;ll get right on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you&#8217;re up and at &#8216;em today, since I just posted my (probably unpublished) comment on your &#8220;Dear NFP&#8221; entry. I&#8217;ll get right on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Arbeit</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Arbeit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>You spelled my name wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You spelled my name wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Everyone, Update: I included my comments within the text of her, em, letter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone, Update: I included my comments within the text of her, em, letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natural Family Planning &#187; Planned Parenthood Exec: Choice Includes NFP</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Natural Family Planning &#187; Planned Parenthood Exec: Choice Includes NFP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>[...] Prologue: I&#8217;ve updated the Think Again Thursdays Update with my comments on Rachel Bereit&amp;#821... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prologue: I&#8217;ve updated the Think Again Thursdays Update with my comments on Rachel Bereit&amp;#821&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>The science speaks for itself.  So does the fact that more and more non-Catholics are interested in and appreciative of NFP.  Praying that more people embrace this physically and emotionally healthy approach!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The science speaks for itself.  So does the fact that more and more non-Catholics are interested in and appreciative of NFP.  Praying that more people embrace this physically and emotionally healthy approach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.nfpworksblog.com/2010/01/14/think-again-thursday-that-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nfpworksblog.com/?p=1214#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>Comments from the link to RB&#039;s post from the NFP group on Facebook:

Wow, she&#039;s really on a rampage. I guess it&#039;s good that she did actually read a little about this. Do you think it&#039;ll actually help if we comment again, as she refused to post the comments last time?--EGB

Prayers for sure!-SV

Wow... all I can say is wow. It&#039;s amazing how someone can be so angry about something she&#039;s never even tried.--Angela Hager

OR researched even! --SV

wow talk about giving an ignorant opinion. I mean rant, fine if you do your research, but without even understanding the basics, why post anything? Prayers for a converted and informed heart for sure.--JV

I commented. It sounds like she has something on her conscience that is bothering her. I know that before I started using NFP I sounded alot like her, and it was probably because I felt guilty about not using it. -DS

Hahaha! Oh... I shouldn&#039;t laugh, but this particular combination of ignorance and arrogance just comes across as funny to me. Seriously, though, I certainly will pray for her.--CW

Dorothy, I agree. She&#039;s operating from some deep wound. I bet she has father issues, and her father was prob Catholic....something like that anyway. Either that, or she&#039;s post abortive, and is not dealing with it.--me

Hmmmm, so I commented on the original post and also provided a bunch of stats with links to the peer-reveiwed articles that back them up. (I also never brought up religion, but stuck to the science.) Interestingly, that never appeared on her page. However, her cut-and-pasted version of what everybody said did appear on her page. Interesting. I agree with so many of the comments above.--RA

Wow. I just can&#039;t believe she overlooks all of the scientific facts like she does. Saying there is nothing to back them up is ridiculous.--Mary Anne H. Plondke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments from the link to RB&#8217;s post from the NFP group on Facebook:</p>
<p>Wow, she&#8217;s really on a rampage. I guess it&#8217;s good that she did actually read a little about this. Do you think it&#8217;ll actually help if we comment again, as she refused to post the comments last time?&#8211;EGB</p>
<p>Prayers for sure!-SV</p>
<p>Wow&#8230; all I can say is wow. It&#8217;s amazing how someone can be so angry about something she&#8217;s never even tried.&#8211;Angela Hager</p>
<p>OR researched even! &#8211;SV</p>
<p>wow talk about giving an ignorant opinion. I mean rant, fine if you do your research, but without even understanding the basics, why post anything? Prayers for a converted and informed heart for sure.&#8211;JV</p>
<p>I commented. It sounds like she has something on her conscience that is bothering her. I know that before I started using NFP I sounded alot like her, and it was probably because I felt guilty about not using it. -DS</p>
<p>Hahaha! Oh&#8230; I shouldn&#8217;t laugh, but this particular combination of ignorance and arrogance just comes across as funny to me. Seriously, though, I certainly will pray for her.&#8211;CW</p>
<p>Dorothy, I agree. She&#8217;s operating from some deep wound. I bet she has father issues, and her father was prob Catholic&#8230;.something like that anyway. Either that, or she&#8217;s post abortive, and is not dealing with it.&#8211;me</p>
<p>Hmmmm, so I commented on the original post and also provided a bunch of stats with links to the peer-reveiwed articles that back them up. (I also never brought up religion, but stuck to the science.) Interestingly, that never appeared on her page. However, her cut-and-pasted version of what everybody said did appear on her page. Interesting. I agree with so many of the comments above.&#8211;RA</p>
<p>Wow. I just can&#8217;t believe she overlooks all of the scientific facts like she does. Saying there is nothing to back them up is ridiculous.&#8211;Mary Anne H. Plondke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.nfpworksblog.com @ 2012-02-08 19:00:45 -->
